Native People's Party

Rascal Panditwadi Congress keeps quite when any innocent Muslim get hanged :

Panditwadi Congress did not open it's mouth when Yakub Memon was getting hanged . Perhaps they had Kela in their mouth . But this not new for Panditwadi Congress . From the begging they coined CIA for every wrong that Videshi Brahmin organizations like RSS etc made to protect them . Then they shifted calling China and Pakistan responsible for every bomb blast ,disturbance made by Videshi Brahmins and labellings as Maowadi to Native people who made any just demand . During eighties they invented new theory apart from blaming Pakistan , blame Bangadeshi particularly Buddhist Chakams rounding them as criminals . Then they felt all the time they can not blame these Muslim populated countries so they started adding local Native poor Muslims like Memon , Ansari etc so that young boys can be picked up from UP , Bihar , Kerala , Maharashtra and put in jail for long as suspect holding responsible for every Brahmin made mischief so that they can claim they are some thing to end terrorism etc.

Even not that Brahminwadis and Panditwadis have made arrangement to blame Muslims for Mahatma Gandhi murder arranging Videshi Brahmin Nathuram Godse's sunta so that when caught he can be presented as Muslim murderer of Gandhiji . Thanks to Sardar Patel and Dr Ambedkar both were alert and Panditwadi , Brahminwadi , Manuwadi failed in their cunning design .

Since then and from that time every Brahminwadi , Panditwadi , Manuwadi forces in power have been blaming and claiming Pakistan and Indian Muslim hand in every mischief carried out by Videshi Brahmin organization .
Yakub Memon in his dieing statement he is innocent , not involved in Mumbai Bomb blast. He told Tiger Memon and Dawood also have no hand in this gruesome sin . Dawood wanted to come back and prove he is innocent so was Tiger . It is told by Jethmalani . Then who carried these Bomb Blasts ? Need fresh Inquiry by Judiciary .

Babari Masjid was demolished then Godhra train burning incident took place then Gujarat riots and then Mumbai Bomb blasts . Recently Justice Kolse Patil said that the bullet which killed Karkare was not from Kasab's gun . Then who killed Karkare ? Every thing is Golmal . One can understand Brahminwadis , Pandits and Manuwadis are hands in gloves that is why congress never raised voice for innocent Muslim killing and inducting in fabricated cases . We therefore call Congress as Rascal Congress , do not shed now crocodile tears after killing Yakub .

Nv. D.D.Raut , President , NPP

Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo 

Mul Bhartiya Vichar Manch

 Court Terrorism : Death sentence to Socrates


Trial and death
Main article: Trial of Socrates

Socrates lived during the time of the transition from the height of the Athenian hegemony to its decline with the defeat by Sparta and its allies in the Peloponnesian War. At a time when Athens sought to stabilize and recover from its humiliating defeat, the Athenian public may have been entertaining doubts about democracy as an efficient form of government. Socrates appears to have been a critic of democracy,[46] and some scholars interpret his trial as an expression of political infighting.[47]
The Death of Socrates, by Jacques-Louis David (1787)

Claiming loyalty to his city, Socrates clashed with the current course of Athenian politics and society.[48] He praises Sparta, archrival to Athens, directly and indirectly in various dialogues. One of Socrates' purported offenses to the city was his position as a social and moral critic. Rather than upholding a status quo and accepting the development of what he perceived as immorality within his region, Socrates questioned the collective notion of "might makes right" that he felt was common in Greece during this period. Plato refers to Socrates as the "gadfly" of the state (as the gadfly stings the horse into action, so Socrates stung various Athenians), insofar as he irritated some people with considerations of justice and the pursuit of goodness.[49] His attempts to improve the Athenians' sense of justice may have been the cause of his execution.

According to Plato's Apology, Socrates' life as the "gadfly" of Athens began when his friend Chaerephon asked the oracle at Delphi if anyone were wiser than Socrates; the Oracle responded that no-one was wiser. Socrates believed the Oracle's response was a paradox, because he believed he possessed no wisdom whatsoever. He proceeded to test the riddle by approaching men considered wise by the people of Athens—statesmen, poets, and artisans—in order to refute the Oracle's pronouncement. Questioning them, however, Socrates concluded: while each man thought he knew a great deal and was wise, in fact they knew very little and were not wise at all. Socrates realized the Oracle was correct; while so-called wise men thought themselves wise and yet were not, he himself knew he was not wise at all, which, paradoxically, made him the wiser one since he was the only person aware of his own ignorance. Socrates' paradoxical wisdom made the prominent Athenians he publicly questioned look foolish, turning them against him and leading to accusations of wrongdoing. Socrates defended his role as a gadfly until the end: at his trial, when Socrates was asked to propose his own punishment, he suggested a wage paid by the government and free dinners for the rest of his life instead, to finance the time he spent as Athens' benefactor.[50] He was, nevertheless, found guilty of both corrupting the minds of the youth of Athens and of impiety ("not believing in the gods of the state"),[51] and subsequently sentenced to death by drinking a mixture containing poison hemlock.[52][53][54][55]
Bust of Socrates in the Vatican Museum

According to Xenophon's story, Socrates purposefully gave a defiant defense to the jury because "he believed he would be better off dead". Xenophon goes on to describe a defense by Socrates that explains the rigors of old age, and how Socrates would be glad to circumvent them by being sentenced to death. It is also understood that Socrates also wished to die because he "actually believed the right time had come for him to die."

Xenophon and Plato agree that Socrates had an opportunity to escape, as his followers were able to bribe the prison guards. There have been several suggestions offered as reasons why he chose to stay:

    He believed such a flight would indicate a fear of death, which he believed no true philosopher has.
    If he fled Athens his teaching would fare no better in another country, as he would continue questioning all he met and undoubtedly incur their displeasure.
    Having knowingly agreed to live under the city's laws, he implicitly subjected himself to the possibility of being accused of crimes by its citizens and judged guilty by its jury. To do otherwise would have caused him to break his "social contract" with the state, and so harm the state, an unprincipled act.
    If he escaped at the instigation of his friends, then his friends would become liable in law.[56]

The full reasoning behind his refusal to flee is the main subject of the Crito.[57]

Socrates' death is described at the end of Plato's Phaedo. Socrates turned down Crito's pleas to attempt an escape from prison. After drinking the poison, he was instructed to walk around until his legs felt numb. After he lay down, the man who administered the poison pinched his foot; Socrates could no longer feel his legs. The numbness slowly crept up his body until it reached his heart. Shortly before his death, Socrates speaks his last words to Crito: "Crito, we owe a rooster to Asclepius. Please, don't forget to pay the debt."

Asclepius was the Greek god for curing illness, and it is likely Socrates' last words meant that death is the cure—and freedom, of the soul from the body. Additionally, in Why Socrates Died: Dispelling the Myths, Robin Waterfield adds another interpretation of Socrates' last words. He suggests that Socrates was a voluntary scapegoat; his death was the purifying remedy for Athens' misfortunes. In this view, the token of appreciation for Asclepius would represent a cure for Athens' ailments.[49]

Can we call this Court Terrorism ? May be !

Nv. D.D.Raut ,
Vicharak , Mul Bhartiya Vichar Manch​

Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo

Native People's Party :

Murderers of Mahatma Gandhi Won once again :

Yakub Memon is given Fasi at 6 .30 AM today 30 th July , 2015  in Nagpur Central Jail . He was hanged till death . His 22 years in Jail could not avert his hanging to life term punishment . He failed in his argument that he has not carried out Bomb Blast of Mumbai like Gandhi failed in his argument that he had not accepted partition of Hindustan and he was killed by Videshi Brahmin Nathuram Godse on 30 January , 1848 at Delhi . Native Non Brahmin Gandhi was killed by Videshi Brahmin Nathuram Godse . Is it not surprising ?

Why Native people expect from Videshi Brahmins truth and justice ?

Nv. D.D.Raut
President , NPP

Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo 

Native People's Party :

Children's Chacha Kalam :

Dr APJ Abdul Kalam has become real popular Chacha of children in schools and colleges and even play ground . He was by nature scientist and therefore always advised children to develop scientific approach in all walks of life . He inspired children to speak out and fearlessly even on those matters which are called field of seniors .

By birth he was Native Indian Non Brahmin following Islam faith . He was believing Dharmatma Kabir and Mahatma Gandhiji thinking of simple living and high thinking .

He surpassed popularity as Chacha of children even of sarkari Chacha Nehru . He proved Non Brahmin Native are competent and brilliant to lead this nation in all fields right from science to government . He will be always remembered as Real Chacha of Children of India .

Nv. D.D.Raut , President , NPP

Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo 

Native People's Party

Gandhiji was murdered by Brahmins , but Hindus were called Extremists ! Why so ? This is Brahmin and Brahminism !

Gandhiji was murdered by Videshi Brahmins whose Brahmin Vedic Dharm is separate from Native Satya Hindu Dharm yet Brahmin murderers were called as Hindus even knowing that they are Videshi Brahmins and they are not Hindus . Most of the news papers mentioned Gandhiji's Brahmin murderers as Hindus as the Panditwadi , Brahminwadi Pandit Nehru government has given insufficient statement hiding Nathuram Godse's Brahmin identity . In fact Brahmins have planed to make show that the killer is Muslim as Nathuram has made his Sunta a few days ago of doing this act of murdering Gandhi .

We call this is Brahmin and Brahminism or Brahminwad and every Brahmin in government under Pandit Nehru acted saving Videshi Brahmins from exposure .

Gandhi murder case was not properly handled , nor proper inquiry was made , Many loopholes were kept so as to save main planner of the murder of Gandhiji . Savarkar , Sandas Veer was even give award by Brahminwadi government .

This is Brahmin  !, this is Brahminwad !

Native Rule wants to end this permanently .

Nv. D.D.Raut , President , NPP

Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo  

Native People's Party
Congress never considered B. G. Tilak as national leader
B.G. Tilak born in1856 and working as Maths teacher in Pune and running an educational society and news papers joined congress in 1990 but he was never considered as National leader by congress and till his death he was not made congress president .

In fact Tilak felt high and dry in congress just after joining congress as the same was run by many that time stalwarts like Dadabahi Navroji etc.
In 1916 Tilak felt he is neglected by Congress and therefore , he started Home Rule League and soon after that in 1920 died without achieving any thing worth while .
It was Mahatma Gandhi who changed Congress from select people's organization to common Native people's organizations bringing many Non Brahmins to prominent positions. Netaji , Sardar Patel , Rajendra Prasad , Krupalani and Abdul Kalam Azad are Non Brahmin faces soon showed their merit and even surpassed Brahmins in many matter .
Congress suffered again during Nehru period after independence and Nehru made congress as Panditwadi house hold organization . Motilal Nehru , Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru , Indira Gandhi , Rajiv Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi finally made congress suffer so much as Panditwadi Congress that the congress is in very bad shape as small Pandittwadi organization begging votes from Dalit. Muslim and Backward classes as the policies of congress always remained confusing .
Nv. D.D.Raut , President , NPP
Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo

Mul Bhartiya Vichar Manch
Brahmin and Brahminism as defined by their originator Videshi Brahmins . They proposed , we disposed as the things stand :
Who are Brahmin ?
Brahmins are Videshi invaders . They invaded Hindustan and destroyed Native Hindustani Sindhu Civilizations , killing several lakhs of Native people . They say Brahmins are born from the mouth of Brahma their adi Purusha as per their Brahmin Dharm Granth Rigveda hymn of Purusha Sukta .
Brahmin is a Varn in Vedic Brahmin Dharm , and also Jaat or Caste of people who are members of it Members are sub divided into numerous communities of Brahmins known as Gotras . Brahmins are singular Varn and Jat and all other Non Brahmins are Native subordinate in various degrees . No Native Hindu who are called by Brahmins as Kshtriya , Vaishya , Shudra or Untouchable is equal in status with Videshi Brahmin .
What is Brahminism or Brahminwad ?
Videshi Brahmins say they are Lords of all Non Brahmins , Shudra etc desertion of life for the sake of a Brahmin causes the ultimate bliss of outcasts , Shudras ---.A Shudra should serve the Brahmins for the sake of heaven or for the sake of both Heaven and Livelihood ---. Mostly to serve the Brahmins is declared to be the most excellent occupation of Shudras , for he does anything other than this is profits to him nothing . His means of life should be arranged by Brahmins in accordance with what is fitting . The leaving of food should be given to him and old clothes so too the rotten part of the grain and so too the old furniture . An accumulation of wealth should not be made by Shudra even if he is able, for Shudra getting possession of wealth merely injures the Brahmins .
So it is clear fro above clarification that both Brahmin and Brahminism or Brahminwad are inseparable . No Brahmin on earth deny this .
Now the question is what made Non Brahmins to say Brahmins and Brahminism or Brahminwad are separate ? We see some Non Brahmin saying that Brahmins and Brahminsm are separate and they say Brahminism is condemnable not Varn or Jat Brahmin . It means they agree that there is Brahmin Varn born from mouth of rapist Brahmha and also they agree to chaturvarn , untochability , bhedbahv etc etc. Now they can not go to Brahmins house for Buttermilk and hide the Bowl they want to collect from Brahmin houses , people , their society , organizations and political parties . They go to the extent of making show that they are progressive , humanist etc etc.
Their other argument in favor of supporting or not criticizing Brahmin is that there are some good Brahmins . Their definition of Good Brahmin is wonderful and they never disclose that what is mean by Good Brahmin ? Their goodness is connected to their own interest and not not of whole society , Nation and Native people .
They say some of the good Brahmins were with Gandhiji and Ambedkar . We say Gandhiji and Dr Ambedkar were good enough to keep them with them and nothing had gone wrong had they not kept Brahmin company . In fact Nation would have gained tremendously had these so called Brahmins not been with these great leaders . We have No Brahmins , in our organizations and we find it is perfectly OK as we need not to wash dirty wounds and clothes of dirty Brahmins . The greatest and holiest duty of any citizen is to protect their house , land , family and country . These Brahamin lover Non Brahmiins do not want to perform that duty at the same time want all benefits on the toil of those Native people who perform these holy duty . We call such Non Brahmin , Videshi Brahmin lovers Jaichands . And only Jaichands can say Brahmin and Brahminism or Brahminwad are separate . We are not Jaichands , so we say Brahmin and Brahminwad are inseparable and both condemnable, fit for wiping out and finished .
Nv. D.D.Raut ,
Vicharak , MBVM
Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo

Mul Bhartiya Vichar Manch
Brahmin and Brahminism as defined by their originator Videshi Brahmins . They proposed , we disposed as the things stand :
Who are Brahmin ?
Brahmins are Videshi invaders . They invaded Hindustan and destroyed Native Hindustani Sindhu Civilizations , killing several lakhs of Native people . They say Brahmins are born from the mouth of Brahma their adi Purusha as per their Brahmin Dharm Granth Rigveda hymn of Purusha Sukta .
Brahmin is a Varn in Vedic Brahmin Dharm , and also Jaat or Caste of people who are members of it Members are sub divided into numerous communities of Brahmins known as Gotras . Brahmins are singular Varn and Jat and all other Non Brahmins are Native subordinate in various degrees . No Native Hindu who are called by Brahmins as Kshtriya , Vaishya , Shudra or Untouchable is equal in status with Videshi Brahmin .
What is Brahminism or Brahminwad ?
Videshi Brahmins say they are Lords of all Non Brahmins , Shudra etc desertion of life for the sake of a Brahmin causes the ultimate bliss of outcasts , Shudras ---.A Shudra should serve the Brahmins for the sake of heaven or for the sake of both Heaven and Livelihood ---. Mostly to serve the Brahmins is declared to be the most excellent occupation of Shudras , for he does anything other than this is profits to him nothing . His means of life should be arranged by Brahmins in accordance with what is fitting . The leaving of food should be given to him and old clothes so too the rotten part of the grain and so too the old furniture . An accumulation of wealth should not be made by Shudra even if he is able, for Shudra getting possession of wealth merely injures the Brahmins .
So it is clear fro above clarification that both Brahmin and Brahminism or Brahminwad are inseparable . No Brahmin on earth deny this .
Now the question is what made Non Brahmins to say Brahmins and Brahminism or Brahminwad are separate ? We see some Non Brahmin saying that Brahmins and Brahminsm are separate and they say Brahminism is condemnable not Varn or Jat Brahmin . It means they agree that there is Brahmin Varn born from mouth of rapist Brahmha and also they agree to chaturvarn , untochability , bhedbahv etc etc. Now they can not go to Brahmins house for Buttermilk and hide the Bowl they want to collect from Brahmin houses , people , their society , organizations and political parties . They go to the extent of making show that they are progressive , humanist etc etc.
Their other argument in favor of supporting or not criticizing Brahmin is that there are some good Brahmins . Their definition of Good Brahmin is wonderful and they never disclose that what is mean by Good Brahmin ? Their goodness is connected to their own interest and not not of whole society , Nation and Native people .
They say some of the good Brahmins were with Gandhiji and Ambedkar . We say Gandhiji and Dr Ambedkar were good enough to keep them with them and nothing had gone wrong had they not kept Brahmin company . In fact Nation would have gained tremendously had these so called Brahmins not been with these great leaders . We have No Brahmins , in our organizations and we find it is perfectly OK as we need not to wash dirty wounds and clothes of dirty Brahmins . The greatest and holiest duty of any citizen is to protect their house , land , family and country . These Brahamin lover Non Brahmiins do not want to perform that duty at the same time want all benefits on the toil of those Native people who perform these holy duty . We call such Non Brahmin , Videshi Brahmin lovers Jaichands . And only Jaichands can say Brahmin and Brahminism or Brahminwad are separate . We are not Jaichands , so we say Brahmin and Brahminwad are inseparable and both condemnable, fit for wiping out and finished .
Nv. D.D.Raut ,
Vicharak , MBVM
Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo

Native All India Daily Workers' Union ( NAIDU )

Constitutional rights of Workers :

Today 46 National Labor Conference is taking place at Delhi to which PM Narendra Modi is inaugurating at Delhi at 10 .30 AM

India does not have figures on Daily Wage Workers . From this one can understand the sordid conditions of Daily Workers in India . 

Main article: Constitution of India
    Wikisource has original text related to this article:
Constitution of India

In the Constitution of India from 1950, articles 14-16, 19(1)(c), 23-24, 38, and 41-43A directly concern labour rights. Article 14 states everyone should be equal before the law, article 15 specifically says the state should not discriminate against citizens, and article 16 extends a right of "equality of opportunity" for employment or appointment under the state. Article 19(1)(c) gives everyone a specific right "to form associations or unions". Article 23 prohibits all trafficking and forced labour, while article 24 prohibits child labour under 14 years old in a factory, mine or "any other hazardous employment".

Articles 38-39, and 41-43A, however, like all rights listed in Part IV of the Constitution are not enforceable by courts, rather than creating an aspirational "duty of the State to apply these principles in making laws".[1] The original justification for leaving such principles unenforceable by the courts was that democratically accountable institutions ought to be left with discretion, given the demands they could create on the state for funding from general taxation, although such views have since become controversial. Article 38(1) says that in general the state should "strive to promote the welfare of the people" with a "social order in which justice, social, economic and political, shall inform all the institutions of national life. In article 38(2) it goes on to say the state should "minimise the inequalities in income" and based on all other statuses. Article 41 creates a "right to work", which the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act 2005 attempts to put into practice. Article 42 requires the state to "make provision for securing just and human conditions of work and for maternity relief". Article 43 says workers should have the right to a living wage and "conditions of work ensuring a decent standard of life". Article 43A, inserted by the Forty-second Amendment of the Constitution of India in 1976,[2] creates a constitutional right to code termination by requiring the state to legislate to "secure the participation of workers in the management of undertakings".

Nv. D.D.Raut , President , NPP

Our Message to Nation : Janeu Chhodo , Bharat Jodo